| 000 | 05046cam a2200313Ia 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1023661 | ||
| 005 | 20140716101408.0 | ||
| 008 | 090305s2008 it ab b i100 0 eng d | ||
| 020 | _a9789251061527 | ||
| 041 | _aENG | ||
| 072 | _aAQ | ||
| 111 | 2 |
_aFAO/NACA Expert Workshop on Understanding and Applying Risk Analysis in Aquaculture _d(2007 _cRayong, Thailand) |
|
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aUnderstanding and applying risk analysis in aquaculture _cedited by Melba G. Bondad-Reantaso, James Richard Arthur and Rohana P. Subasinghe |
| 260 |
_aRome _bFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations _cc2008 |
||
| 300 |
_axiii, 304 p. _bill., map _c29 cm. |
||
| 490 | 1 |
_aFAO fisheries and aquaculture technical paper _v519 |
|
| 500 | _a"A project "Application of risk analysis to aquaculture production" was undertaken in 2007 through a desk study and an expert workshop held in Rayong, Thailand, from 7 to 11 June 2007 ... Part 2 of this document contains the highlights of the FAO/NACA Expert Workshop on Understanding and Applying Risk Analysis in Aquaculture..."--P. iii | ||
| 504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references | ||
| 520 | 3 | _aAs a food-producing sector, aquaculture has surpassed both capture fisheries and the terrestrial farmed meat production systems in terms of average annual growth rate. However, it has a number of biosecurity concerns that pose risks and hazards to both its development and management, and to the aquatic environment and society. Aquaculture faces risks similar to those of the agriculture sector. However, as aquaculture is very diverse (in terms of species, environments, systems and practices), the range of hazards and the perceived risks are complex. Multiple objectives are driving the application of risk analysis to aquaculture. Foremost is for resource protection (human, animal and plant health; aquaculture; wild fisheries and the general environment) as embodied in international agreements and responsibilities. The other drivers of risk analysis are: (i) food security, (ii) trade, (iii) consumer preference for high quality and safe products, (iv) production profitability and (v) other investment and development objectives. The expert workshop, using a series of seven review papers commissioned by the desk study, focused on the importance and application of risk analysis to seven major risk sectors of aquaculture production: pathogen risks, food safety and public health risks, ecological (pests) risks, genetic risks, environmental risks, financial risks and social risks. Part 1 of the document consists of 12 peer-reviewed technical papers relative to the application of risk analysis to aquaculture that were prepared by 23 specialists papers on: general principles of risk analysis, food safety and public health risks associated with products of aquaculture, pathogen risk analysis, application of risk analysis to genetic issues in aquaculture ecological risk assessment and management of exotic organisms, introduced marine species risk assessment, guidelines for ecological risk assessment of marine fish aquaculture, the aquaculture insurance industry risk analysis process and risk analysis experiences from small-scale shrimp farmers in India. Part 2 contains the detailed outcomes of the deliberations of 42 experts who developed the contents of a Manual on the Application of Risk Analysis to Aquaculture, discussed in great length the seven risk sectors and reached general conclusions and specific recommendations to enhance the application of the risk analysis process to aquaculture production. Risk analysis methods as applied to the seven risk sectors have many commonalities but also many differences. An overriding feature is a firm foundation in drawing upon the results of scientific studies, the use of logic or deductive reasoning and the application of common sense in assessing risk and applying risk management measures. General principles that apply to risk analysis for aquaculture include application of the precautionary approach when dealing with uncertainty, transparency of the process, consistency in methodolody, use of stakeholder consultation, application of high level of stringency, use of minimal risk management interventions needed to achieve an acceptable level of risk, the concept of unacceptable risk and recognition that some "risky" actions cannot be managed and therefore should not be permitted under any circumstance, and the concept of equivalence where alternative risk management measures achieving the required level of protection are equally acceptable | |
| 530 | _aAlso available on the World Wide Web | ||
| 650 | 0 |
_935046 _aAquaculture |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aBondad-Reantaso, Melba G. _958650 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aArthur, J. R. _q(James Richard), _d1948- _969048 |
|
| 700 | 1 |
_aSubasinghe, R. P. _q(Rohana P.) _968448 |
|
| 710 | 2 |
_aFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations _972824 |
|
| 830 | 0 |
_aFAO fisheries and aquaculture technical paper _v519 |
|
| 856 | 4 | 1 | _uhttp://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0490e/i0490e00.htm |
| 942 | _cS | ||
| 999 |
_c45956 _d45951 |
||